The evolving landscape of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) in higher education is reshaping the role of Chief Diversity Officers (CDOs) (El-Amin, 2022b). Historically positioned as the primary drivers of DEIB initiatives, CDOs are now increasingly being viewed as part of a broader ecosystem of community engagement within academic institutions (Barnett, 2020). This shift acknowledges the need for DEIB leadership to be embedded across all levels of the organization, rather than concentrated in a single role (Sernak, 2021). As diversity issues, there is a growing recognition that effective DEIB practices require a collaborative approach, shared responsibility, and integration into the institution’s core operations and strategic objectives (El-Amin & George, 2020). This expose explores the factors contributing to this shift, including the limitations of traditional CDO roles, the need for decentralized efforts, the importance of training and development for all leaders, and the necessity for data-driven and sustainable DEIB programs.
The role of Chief Diversity Officers (CDOs) in higher education has undergone significant transformation over recent years (El-Amin, 2022b). Initially conceived as pivotal figures responsible for driving diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, CDOs now face an evolving landscape that demands a more comprehensive approach to community engagement and shared responsibility (El-Amin, 2022). The recognition that DEIB efforts must permeate all levels of academic institutions has led to a paradigm shift from a reliance on a singular CDO to a more distributed model of leadership. This reflection delves into the reasons behind this shift, the implications for institutional practices, and the necessity for integrating DEIB into the fabric of higher education.
The Traditional Role of Chief Diversity Officers
Historically, CDOs held a unique position within academic institutions, often tasked with developing and implementing diversity initiatives, addressing inequities, and advocating for underrepresented populations (Williams, & Wade-Golden, 2023). Their roles typically involved assessing institutional climate, conducting training, and advising on policy changes related to DEIB. However, many CDOs found themselves isolated within administrative structures, lacking the authority or resources necessary to enact meaningful change (Nicotera et al., 2022). This isolation often resulted in limited effectiveness, as diversity leadership was relegated to a peripheral role rather than being woven into the institution’s core mission and strategic objectives.
Limitations of the CDO Role
The structural placement of CDOs within academic institutions frequently undermined their ability to effect change. Many CDOs operated in silos, leading to a disconnection between DEIB initiatives and the broader institutional mission (Nishii & Leroy, 2022). As a result, there was often insufficient collaboration with faculty, staff, and students, which hindered the development of comprehensive strategies for addressing diversity-related challenges. Furthermore, the reliance on a single CDO to champion DEIB efforts inadvertently shifted the responsibility away from the entire community, fostering a culture of complacency among other leaders and stakeholders.
The Shift Toward Community Engagement
Recognizing these limitations, academic institutions are increasingly embracing a more holistic approach to DEIB by transitioning from a reliance on CDOs to community engagement officers or decentralized DEIB councils (Bisson et al., 2022). This shift reflects a broader understanding that diversity leadership must be a collective effort, integrated across all levels of the institution (Nicotera et al., 2022). Community engagement emphasizes collaboration, partnership, and shared responsibility, which are essential for creating sustainable change in the academic environment.
Decentralization of DEIB Efforts
One of the primary reasons for this shift is the recognition that effective DEIB leadership must be decentralized. Institutions are encouraged to establish diversity councils, task forces, and cross-departmental committees that include a wide range of voices and expertise (El-Amin, 2022b). By distributing DEIB responsibilities throughout the institution, universities can ensure that diversity is not treated as a peripheral issue but is embedded within every department and decision-making process (Bisson et al., 2022). This approach fosters greater accountability among leaders, faculty, and staff and promotes a culture of shared responsibility for achieving DEIB goals.
Training and Development for All Leaders
Another critical aspect of this transition is the necessity for training and development for all institutional leaders, not just CDOs. As responsibility for DEIB initiatives is distributed, it is essential that leaders across the organization are well-versed in DEIB principles and capable of guiding their departments toward more inclusive practices (El-Amin, 2024). Professional development programs can equip leaders with the skills needed to address implicit bias, foster inclusive environments, and manage conflicts related to diversity issues (El-Amin et al., 2023). By building a cadre of informed leaders, institutions can create a more supportive climate for diversity efforts and ensure that DEIB remains a priority at all levels (Ward & El-Amin, 2022).
Data-Driven DEIB Initiatives
The increasing reliance on data to drive DEIB initiatives represents another factor in the shift away from traditional CDO roles (Nicotera et al., 2022). Academic institutions are utilizing data analytics to track progress on diversity goals, identify areas needing intervention, and align DEIB initiatives with the institution’s strategic objectives. This data-driven approach allows institutions to move beyond anecdotal evidence and implement evidence-based strategies that address the specific needs of their students, faculty, and staff (El-Amin & George, 2020). By leveraging data, institutions can monitor the impact of their DEIB initiatives and make informed decisions about resource allocation and program development.
Sustainable DEIB Programs
The sustainability of DEIB programs is also crucial in light of this shift. Historically, DEIB initiatives have often been tied to the efforts of specific diversity officers, leading to inconsistent implementation when leadership changes occur (El-Amin, 2022b). To avoid this pitfall, institutions should focus on building long-term infrastructure that supports DEIB initiatives regardless of changes in leadership. This can be achieved by formalizing diversity policies, creating permanent structures such as diversity offices or committees, and embedding DEIB principles into the institution’s mission and strategic plan.
Aligning DEIB with the Academic Mission
An important aspect of the shift from CDOs to community engagement officers is the alignment of DEIB efforts with the institution’s academic mission (Nicotera et al., 2022). In higher education, diversity is not just a matter of representation; it is a critical component of academic excellence. Institutions are encouraged to integrate DEIB principles into their curricula, research, and community engagement efforts (Bisson et al., 2022). By doing so, they can create a more inclusive academic environment that values diverse perspectives and promotes equity in teaching, learning, and scholarship.
Recommendations
1. Develop Diversity Councils: Institutions should establish diversity councils that include representatives from various departments and constituencies to foster collaboration and shared ownership of DEIB initiatives.
2. Implement Professional Development: Invest in ongoing training and development for all leaders to equip them with the skills necessary to address diversity issues effectively.
3. Utilize Data Analytics: Leverage data to track progress on DEIB goals and identify areas for improvement, ensuring that initiatives are aligned with institutional strategic objectives.
4. Formalize Diversity Policies: Create and institutionalize diversity policies that reflect the commitment to DEIB at all levels of the organization, ensuring sustainability beyond individual leadership.
5. Integrate DEIB into Academic Mission: Embed DEIB principles into the academic curriculum, research agenda, and community engagement efforts to create a truly inclusive academic environment.
By adopting these recommendations, academic institutions can move toward a more integrated, holistic approach to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging, ultimately enhancing the educational experience for all members of the community.
Conclusion
The transition from relying solely on Chief Diversity Officers to embracing community engagement officers represents a significant evolution in the approach to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in higher education. This shift reflects a broader understanding that DEIB leadership must be a collective effort, integrated across all levels of the institution (El-Amin, 2022b). By decentralizing DEIB responsibilities, providing training and development for all leaders, adopting data-driven strategies, and ensuring the sustainability of DEIB programs, academic institutions can foster a more inclusive and equitable environment that benefits all members of the community.
Dr. Abeni El-Amin, PhD, EdD, DPC, MPsy – I/O, LSSMBB, has nearly two decades of experience and education in management and economics as an educator and practitioner. Further, as a higher education professor, she has designed and developed curriculum and training programs in business administration, educational leadership, legal studies, political science, psychology, and health sciences. She is a globally recognized thought leader on diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB). She helps organizations develop a culture of belongingness through innovative and thought-provoking trainings. Dr. El-Amin is an author, international university professor, corporate trainer, and speaker. Dr. El-Amin is the editor of Implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging Management in Organizational Change Initiatives and Implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Educational Management Practices – IGI Global. Dr. El-Amin is co-founder of Titan and Mogul, Inc., a global consultancy that provides lean six sigma and HR consultancy focusing on DEIB to improve organizational culture. She is also the author of, In Search of Servant Leadership.
References
Barnett, R. (2020). Leading with meaning: Why diversity, equity, and inclusion matters in US higher education. Perspectives in Education, 38(2), 20-35.
Bisson, L. F., Jamison-McClung, D., Grindstaff, L., Katehi, L., & de Leon Siantz, M. L. (2022). Leadership and organizational structure. Uprooting Bias in the Academy: Lessons from the Field, 81-95.
El-Amin, A. (2022a). Improving organizational commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. In Social justice research methods for doctoral research (pp. 208-221). IGI Global.
El-Amin, A. (2022b). Organizational climate change: diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. In Implementing diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging management in organizational change initiatives (pp. 1-23). IGI Global.
El-Amin, A. (2024). Leading the diversity and inclusion narrative through continuing professional education. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 7(3), 268-281.
El-Amin, A., & George, B. (2020). Towards a model and strategy for transformational change. Economics, Management and Sustainability, 5(2), 28-38.
El-Amin, A., Hall, A. H., & Wilson, K. B. (2023). Developing cultural competency through a multicultural lens. In Facilitating Social Justice, Service Delivery, and Advocacy Through Multicultural Counseling Competencies (pp. 156-170). IGI Global.
Nicotera, N., Cutforth, N., Fretz, E., & Thompson, S. S. (2022). Dedication to community engagement: A higher education conundrum?. Journal of community engagement and scholarship, 4(1).
Nishii, L. H., & Leroy, H. (2022). A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 683-722.
Sernak, J. D. (2021). The Professional Practice of Chief Diversity Officers: Defining the Changing Role in Institutional Culture for Diversity. Wilmington University (Delaware).
Ward, S., & El-Amin, A. (2022). Reconceptualizing diversity training predictors of training success. In Implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Educational Management Practices (pp. 258-277). IGI Global.
Williams, D. A., & Wade-Golden, K. C. (2023). The chief diversity officer: Strategy structure and change management. Taylor & Francis.
