Course and Instructor Evaluations: Misconceptions and Realities
If evaluation sounds good in theory but feels bad in practice, it may be that you or others are operating under some common misconceptions.
If evaluation sounds good in theory but feels bad in practice, it may be that you or others are operating under some common misconceptions.
Unless they have a real problem with how the course was run, most students fill out end-of-course evaluations so quickly there’s often very little valuable information in them. Here are two ways that Wayne Hall, psychology professor at San Jacinto College in Texas, elicits helpful feedback on his courses:
What obligations do faculty members have to their institutions beyond their disciplines and departments? It’s a question that is sure to get a lot of play as higher education institutions deal with the pressures brought about by increased scrutiny from outside constituents and other factors such as changing student demographics and a shift from a faculty-focused to a learner-focused orientation.
Evaluations mandated by institutions generally assess application of faculty expertise to teaching, research, and service. But as Keig (1994) states in Collaborative Peer Review, “Clearly,
Get exclusive access to programs, reports, podcast episodes, articles, and more!