Love it or hate it, group work has its place in online higher education. Group projects provide opportunities and positive outcomes for students to take leadership roles, learn personal accountability and project management skills, network with peers, negotiate roles and workload, and more.
On the other side, especially when courses are online, the “people” factor can sometimes interfere with the positive outcomes of group projects: responsible students who take on all the work, lurkers who do not contribute but who “earn” the same grade, members who drop a course mid-project, conflict over topics and/or roles, schedules that do not allow for synchronous group meetings, and the list goes on. Some instructors avoid group work altogether in online courses because of these “people” factors and because too many students are untrained in group work skills. It seems too daunting to train students and still cover content online.
Yet, online students want more social and emotional connections with their peers, their instructors, and their content. But, can we provide these connections in online courses without going the route of group projects, especially in courses with large enrollments?
Let’s think about how small groups can work for students.
What if we take away high stakes group projects and focus on the power of small groups?
Targeted, small group check-ins can provide the means for peer engagement and for relevant social and emotional learning, both of which contribute to student retention and success. Small group check-ins centered on social and emotional learning (SEL) activities can occur throughout the semester and in multiple modalities, synchronous online meetings or asynchronous tools, and meet diverse needs and goals.
SEL scholars Stocker and Gallagher define SEL as “the development of information, mindsets, and skills that allow individuals to identify and manage their emotions, enhance their awareness of and empathy for others, and establish and work toward personal goals” (2019, p.25). Stocker and Gallagher frame SEL activities using the five components of Collaboration for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL): Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Responsible Decision Making, Social Awareness, and Relationship Skills (2019, p.25). Introducing SEL in the course syllabus and embedding it in course objectives and content helps students to see its value and feel prepared for check-ins.
To keep SEL check-ins relevant and out of the realm of “busy work,” instructors can align these activities with course-level learning objectives, course content, and course assessments. Scholar Ashley Taplin promotes presenting SEL activities with intention, “sharing with our students the why behind SEL content, just as we do with academic content. Explaining why we check in, why we ask students to pair up, or why we work through different problem-solving strategies is core to meaningful and successful SEL” (2021). Instructors can choose to assign points to incentivize student participation, but creating activities that are relevant and that scaffold course content/assessments might be enough.
What activities are relevant for on-going SEL check-in meetings?
First and foremost, small group “first week” check-ins are vital for students to feel connected and to build meaningful relationships with peers. While whole group course introductions are important tools for community building, they can also feel intimidating and students can feel let down if this introduction is their opportunity for peer interaction. After the big introduction, scheduling small group check-ins right away in the first week facilitates closer connections and community building on a smaller scale. To be intentional about SEL, this initial check-in should include an introduction to SEL, it’s place in the course, and the “why” for the specific check-in (Taplin, 2021). It’s important that the first and all following check-ins include specific prompts and “why” statements, and Taplin provides a multitude of helpful examples.
Possible examples for early-in-the-semester check-in groups:
- Reintroduce themselves in the smaller group
- Brainstorm a small group guide for communicating, listening, and interacting to maintain respect, empathy, and learning. Ask that they take notes and keep this for reference
- Share their challenges and successes in the first week
- Share what they know or their questions about campus or larger community resources—where to find comfort food, student organizations, institutions for meeting religious or social needs
- Share their goals for reading, labs, or homework for their different courses
- Share their processes for conducting research and/or writing papers
- Share midterm changes in goals and managing time
- Share learning experiences
- Share midterm challenges and successes
- Share preparation strategies for final exams and final projects
How do check-ins work in terms of tools?
Small group check-ins can work for both synchronous and asynchronous online modalities. For those already holding synchronous online meeting platform sessions, breakout rooms are perfect. For those courses that are totally asynchronous, students can conduct small groups in real time or not real time (NRT). They can also use a multitude of tools, including: Blackboard, Brightspace, or Canvas group tools, subgroups in VoiceThread, Google Meet or Spaces, and other Google Suite tools, Zoom, GoToMeeting, etc. Instructors might let students decide on the tools to use or they might set up small group spaces in the LMS.
Should check-ins be graded and how should they be assessed?
If check-ins for small groups are relevant and tied to course objectives in some way, it makes sense to assign low-stakes points. In their “A Guide to Incorporating Social-Emotional Learning in the College Classroom,” Gallagher and Stocker provided students activity handouts with instructions and had students submit these via their LMS (2018, pp. 13-15). Because these check-ins are peer engagement-focused, Gallagher and Stocker did not grade content and opted for a variation of complete/incomplete and weighted the SEL activities at 5% of the total grade (2018, pp. 15-16). In this way, students had point incentives for participating in SEL activities, but they retained agency in regard to how they participated. Small group check-ins should be “safe” for social and emotional learning, keeping them low-stakes, student-centered, and student-mediated is probably the best route.
Small group SEL check-ins provide students with relevant and low-stakes opportunities for meaningful peer engagement, community building, and social and emotional learning, all of which can benefit student retention and success.
Caran Howard is an instructional development specialist at the University of Northern Iowa in Cedar Falls. In 2015, she earned a PhD in social foundations of education, with an emphasis in history of education. Howard earned her MA and BA in English, with a writing emphasis from the University of Northern Iowa (UNI). Howard has over 19 years of teaching experience in higher education and community organizations: UNI, the University of Iowa, Wartburg College, Hawkeye Community College, the Hearst Center for the Arts, and adult education.
References:
Aguilar, M. (September 16, 2021). 5 Adaptable SEL Strategies for In-Person or Distance Learning. Edutopia. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.edutopia.org/article/5-adaptable-sel-strategies-person-or-distance-learning
Dougan, R. Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Guidebook: Ideas for Incorporating SEL Activities into Your Classroom. Diablo Valley College. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.dvc.edu/faculty-staff/pdfs/SEL-Guidebook.pdf
Elmi, C. (2020). Integrating Social Emotional Learning Strategies in Higher Education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology, and Education. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/10/3/61/pdf
Eva, A. L. (February 25, 2019). How to Take SEL to the Next Level at Your School. Greater Good Magazine: Science-Based Insights for a Meaningful Life. University of California Berkeley. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_to_take_sel_to_the_next_level_at_your_school
Gallagher, K. M., and Stocker, S. L. (2018). A Guide to Incorporating Social-Emotional Learning in the College Classroom: Busting Anxiety, Boosting Ability. Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://teachpsych.org/resources/Documents/otrp/resources/Gallagher%20and%20Stocker%20SEL%20Manual%20-%20FULL.pdf
Kachani, S., Irvin, A., and Ross, C. (May 24, 2021). What College Students Wish Professors Knew About Inclusive Online Teaching. EdSurge. Accessed October 5, 2021. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2021-05-24-what-college-students-wish-professors-knew-about-inclusive-online-teaching
Murphy, M. C., Boucher, K., and Logel, C. (January 19, 2021). How to Help Students Feel a Sense of Belonging During the Pandemic. Greater Good Magazine: Science-Based Insights For A Meaningful Life. University of California Berkeley. Accessed October 5, 2021. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_to_help_students_feel_a_sense_of_belonging_during_the_pandemic
Quirk, J. M., and Quirk, J. P. (July 20, 2020). What Incoming First-Year Students Want Online Learning to Be. Educause Review. Accessed October 5, 2021. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/7/what-incoming-first-year-students-want-online-learning-to-be
SEL in Higher Ed [Research Guide]. Inside SEL. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://insidesel.com/research-guides/sel-in-higher-ed/
Stocker, S. L., and Gallagher, K. M. (January 24, 2018). Alleviating and Altering Appraisals: Social-Emotional Learning in the College Classroom. College Teaching. 67: 1. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/87567555.2018.1515722?scroll=top&needAccess=true&
Taplin, A. (April 8, 2021). How to Embed SEL into Your Instruction. Edutopia. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.edutopia.org/article/how-embed-sel-your-instruction
Vagelos, O. Online Learning: Designing for Engagement and Collaboration. Ideo U. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/online-learning-designing-for-engagement-and-collaboration?__twitter_impression=true
Wilcher, T. (February, 2020). Supporting the “whole” Student: Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and the Flipped Classroom. Center for Faculty Development. Old Dominion University. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.odu.edu/facultydevelopment/news/2020/2/supporting_the_whole
Wut, Tm., Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: a social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review. 22, 371–383. Accessed October 5, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09673-1
